Bounded by construction
The worst case is set by the architecture, not by judgment in the moment.
Systematic, fully automated, and bounded by construction. An AI layer that can veto a position but never enlarge one — behind hard limits it cannot reach.
The edge is refusing to overshoot.
The worst case is set by the architecture, not by judgment in the moment.
The system does not ask permission and cannot be talked into a trade. Human involvement is limited to halting it.
The analyst layer may veto or reduce. It has no path to increase exposure, by design rather than by policy.
When a component is unavailable or state cannot be verified, the system does nothing rather than something.
Nothing runs that has not cleared a written acceptance standard fixed in advance.
Out-of-sample walk-forward results, 2018–2026, net of modeled fees, slippage and funding. Not live trading performance.
These were tested against the same standard and rejected.
Configurations that raised returns while breaching the drawdown ceiling.
A broader asset universe that improved headline performance and failed the risk standard.
Candidates with attractive headline profitability whose risk-adjusted results revealed small-sample luck rather than durable edge.
An entire category of position that was permanently disabled once its financing cost was shown to consume the whole expected return — a result the cost model predicted before the test was run.
The full validation method, acceptance standard and limitations.
Read the approach